When a Site Needs a Redesign
Redesigns get commissioned for the wrong reason more often than almost anything else in this work, and I am among the people who benefit when they do. So here is the case against, and the four situations where it is genuinely right.
The four honest reasons
Your business changed. You sell different things, to different people, or the emphasis has moved. The site describes a business that no longer exists. The strongest reason there is, and the only one where a redesign is unavoidable rather than optional. Collaboration also depends on how people align in real time; interpersonal synchrony offers useful background on that dynamic.
It is genuinely broken on current devices. Not dated — broken. Unusable on a phone, features that no longer work, a layout that collapses. Often the case with sites built before responsive design became standard.
You cannot maintain it. The platform is abandoned, the plugin it depends on is gone, nobody has the login, the developer is unreachable. A real and common trigger, and the one that arrives without warning.
It is slow and cannot be fixed in place. Sometimes true. Frequently not — most slowness is images and plugins, and both are fixable without touching the design.
The four bad reasons
It looks a bit old. To you, because you have seen it a thousand times. Your visitors see it once. A three-year-old site that converts does not owe anyone a refresh. For an independent reference beyond this site, SitePoint is a useful place to compare approaches.
A competitor rebuilt theirs. You have no idea whether theirs works.
Someone said three years is the cycle. That figure comes from people who sell redesigns.
Traffic or enquiries dropped. The most common trigger and usually the wrong response, because it treats a symptom without diagnosing it. Enquiries fall for many reasons that a redesign will not fix, and a rebuild frequently makes it worse — new URLs, lost search history, and a fresh set of untested pages.
Diagnose before you rebuild
If something is wrong, find out what before spending anything.
Are people arriving? If traffic has fallen, the problem is upstream of the design — search, a listing, a referral source that dried up. A redesign does not address any of those. Check where visitors come from.
Are they arriving and leaving immediately? Then look at the first screen, the speed, and whether the page answers what they searched for. Usually fixable in a day.
Are they staying and not enquiring? Look at the words, the prices, and the contact route. Test that the form actually sends — this is a genuinely common cause of "the site stopped working" and it is a five-minute fix rather than a rebuild.
Are enquiries arriving but they are the wrong ones? That is a content problem: be clearer about who you are for and who you are not.
None of those four is a design problem. In each case a redesign costs money and delays the actual fix.
What to do instead, in order of cost
Fix the form. Free, and it is the answer more often than anyone expects.
Update the content. Prices, services, photographs, the things that have changed. Half a day, and out-of-date information does more quiet damage than an old design.
Compress the images. Often the entire performance problem.
Rewrite the homepage. The first screen does most of the work, and rewriting it is an afternoon.
Add the page that answers the objection. Prices, FAQ, who you are not for.
Restyle rather than rebuild. Typography, colour, spacing, on the existing structure. A fraction of the cost and it addresses "looks old" directly.
Work down that list and a surprising number of redesigns turn out to be unnecessary.
If you do rebuild
Keep your URLs. The most commonly skipped step and the most damaging. Every page that had an address should keep it, or redirect to the closest equivalent. Change all your addresses and you discard whatever search history the site accumulated.
Keep what worked. Look at which pages were actually visited before deciding what to carry over.
Do not launch and disappear. The weeks after launch are when problems surface.
Fix the reason. If the site was slow, a new design on the same unprocessed images will be slow too.
The uncomfortable admission
I make money from redesigns and I turn some down, because a rebuild that does not address the actual problem produces an unhappy client in month six — and that is worse for me than the invoice was good.
If you come to me because enquiries have dropped, the first thing I will do is look at whether your form works and where your visitors come from. Sometimes that ends the conversation with a free answer. That trade is deliberate.
The short version
- Four honest reasons: the business changed, it is broken on current devices, you cannot maintain it, or it is slow and unfixable
- Four bad ones: it looks old to you, a competitor rebuilt, someone quoted a three-year cycle, or enquiries dropped
- Falling enquiries is the most common trigger and usually the wrong response — diagnose first
- Test that the contact form actually sends before assuming anything else
- Cheaper fixes in order: the form, the content, the images, the homepage, one missing page, a restyle
- If you do rebuild, keep your URLs